that there is a sheath to the whole bundle composed of strongly
thickened fibrous cells, that each of these cells has its own membrane and is entirely closed, and that they resemble the bast
and the fibrous elements of the wood of Dicotyledons. The
segmented wood-cells and the parenchyma-cells of the wood
arranged in rows are incidentally noticed. Under the name of
fibrous tubes he included the cells of the sclerenchyma-sheath
of many vascular bundles and the true bast and wood-fibres,
which latter he says are wanting in the Coniferae. He explained
the secondary growth in thickness of rind and bast by the example of the shoot of the vine, in which he correctly distinguished
the medullary sheath and the spiral vessels. In herbaceous dicotyledons he found the bundles of vessels to consist of a bast portion and a woody portion, and he attributed the formation of the compact wood of true woody plants to the blending together of the woody portions of these separate bundles.
In discussing the parenchymatous cell-tissue he rejects emphatically and on good grounds the origin of new cells from the granular contents of older ones, which had been the view of Sprengel and Treviranus, as also the theory of Wolff and Mirbel, while he maintains against Mirbel especially, that the separation of fibrous tubes is possible even where no dividing line can be seen between them in the cross section. He considers that both in thin-walled and thick-walled parenchyma the dividing wall is double and the cell-membrane entirely closed. 'It appears,' he continues on p. 86, 'from these observations that cellular substance consists of separate closed tubes, which may be round or oval, or more or less elongated, or almost cylindrical in shape, and these by mutual pressure assume an angular and flattened form, which is either regular like the cells of the comb of bees or more or less irregular. Such an aggregate of separate cells (and here he is certainly quite right) has nothing in common with a tissue, and the word cell-tissue seems therefore less suitable than the term cellular substance, composed of cell-like tubes.' Further on he rejects Mirbel's idea of the
