are collected from experiments of mixed orders, and display
the conserquenees of the evil quality of jealousy, and the
prospeet of its beeoming the fountain of good. This jealousy is graduated by the approach towards the object, on the attainment of which the perfection of Mr. Adams's system depends; and the exact adjustment of a balance of
power and wealth between political orders, begets the utmost degree of its malignity; it becomes deadly, like that
between two pretenders to the throne. It produces effects,
like those produced in England, by a balance of wealth and
power between the crown and the nobility. As equality in
wealth and power, or a perfect political balance, is the utmost excitement of jealousy, so it is stiffed by subordination;
and the farther a form of government precedes from Mr.
Adams's point of perfection, the less it is exposed to the
discord of a rivalry for dominion. As the violent struggles
between the crown and nobles in England, demonstrate the
consequences of an attainment of Mr. Adams's political
balance; so their long intermission demonstrates the consequences of a recession from his point of perfection. It is simply the question whether two or three kings are better than one, on account of the jealousy with which the one case will be blessed, and its absence from the second. The policy of the United States, by acknowledging the sovereignty of the people without a balance or a rival power, and by establishing a subordination to their opinion, has rejected the quality of jealousy, contended for by its defender.
Mr. Adams's book abounds with the evils inflicted on mankind by the contention of orders, but it omits to display the evils of their union in England; it opposes to its own facts a theory for their management, but omits to add that it has never succeeded; and it allows to nations a capacity for instituting and keeping in repair, an intricate equilibrium of power and wealth among orders, but denies that they are capable of self government.
The quotations demonstrate the enmity between the policy of the United States, and Mr. Adams's system; and a
