transfers property to its amount, is so well convinced that
the motive exciting nations to self defence is then by impaired, as to resort to the alternative of a stauding army, ard to
stake the national existence upon a battle, to be fought by
mercenaries. The people and armies of the Roman empire
frequently preferred a coalition with Scythian invaders, to
the danger of resistance, or the calamity of victory; and
twelve millions of people are apprehending or invoking conquest, on account of an unanimous opinion, that paper stork
has incapacitated a great nation for defending itself against
a single army.
Oppressive taxation is the effect of standing armies, noble orders, hierarchies or paper stock. A similarity in moral etfects. demonstrates a similarity in moral causes. All of these have pretended to defend nations at different periods. England possesses all these defenders. The first and the last are the modern champions of nations: if she had possessed neither, she never would have gained sundry victories, but she would have possessed a gallantry which burthensome taxes never inspired. And what conqueror can be more oppressive than two mercenary armies, one of soldiers, and another of stockjobbers? Besides, funding never fights for a nation in imminent danger; its wars are guided by other calculations, than those of publick safety; and the moment of peril is the moment of its flight.
If posterity could pass a law, for imposing heavy taxes on the present generation, the entire universe of existing progenitors would exclaim, " if you can rob us of property, we can rob you of life. It is better that you should never exist, than that we who do exist, should be the prey of your avarice; than that a series of generations should be sacrificed to one unborn and unsympathising." In the character of sufferers, the parties concur. Progenitorp would destroy posterity, and posterity would destroy progenitors, rather than submit to unlimited. unfeeling and unconsented to taxation.
