rests to produce peace, justice and happiness, as that any
artificial arrangement of a society composed of lions,
wolves and bears, would prevent the effects of their natural
qualities; because the natural qualities of moral beings (if
the expression is allowable) such as hereditary orders and
separate factitious interests, are not less certain and unchangeable, than those of these beasts.
The inability of mere form or artificial arrangement, to defeat a natural law, even of the moral kind, is demonstrated in the experience of the United States. These forms or arrangements have been frequently changed, and are different among the states. But the irresistible power of the moral principles common to all, compels every modification to be subservient to its will. And the good effects under different forms, produced by the good moral principles of all, are an evidence, that evil moral principles cannot be made to produce good moral effects by the force of form or artificial arrangement; it would be as possible, that a less mechanical power should control a greater
A theory or hypothesis, cannot pretend even to plausibility, unless it is deduced from some general law of nature. One which sets out upon the foundation of hereditary orders or alienable exclusive privileges, violates the law, which has determined that talents shall not be inheritable, nor merit transferable. Let us endeavour further to apply this observation to Mr. Adams's system, by comparing it with the agrarian theory.
The idea of Lord Shaftsbury, adopted by Mr. Adams, is, that the political balance of orders cannot be adjusted or maintained, without a balance of property." The perpetual changes among the holders of land, the most permanent and unchangeable species of property, renders this ingredient unattainable. And yet its attainment is obstructed by fewer difficulties, than a permanent and equal distribution of power and mental capacity, necessary to perfect the system of orders. As the system proposes to produce good effects, upon no other condition than that of violating and
