Page:Knight (1975) Past, Future and the Problem of Communication in the Work of V V Khlebnikov.djvu/120

This page needs to be proofread.
112

But just as all this is what writing "says" (regardless of what might happen to be written), so oral language—and its resurrection in Radio—has a definite "message" of its own. In writing about Radio, McLuhan has a tendency to describe certain possibilities or potentialities as if they were already facts. Making all due allowances for this, however-and for his usual exaggeration—it seems that he has something important to say about the "message" which the electronic media may bring. McLuhan's relevance to a study of Khlebnikov should be obvious:

By surpassing writing, we have regained our sensorial WHOLEHESS, not on a national or cultural plane, but on a cosmic plane We have evoked a super-civilized sub-primitive man.[1]

By restoring in a new form the oral cultures and priorities of the past, Radio brings a future which is also a kind of 'return' to the prehistoric past:

Bless the electric return to the tribal paleolithic age, to the world of the hunter![2]

0r again:

We begin to structure the primordial feelings and emotions from which 5,000 years of literacy divorced us.[3]

In that sense, we are back again in the beginning of the world:

Extensions of man are the hominization of the world. It is a 2nd phase of the original creation.[4]

Or, in another sense, it is the end of the world:

Just as history begins with writing, so it ends with TV.[5]

The basic fact of the new "language-form" is that it presupposes and in a sense creates a new awareness of unity:

we begin to realize the depth of our involvement in one another as a total human community.[6]

0r again:


  1. Counter-Blast p 16.
  2. Ibid p 43.
  3. Ibid p 17.
  4. Ibid p 54.
  5. Ibid p 122.
  6. Ibid p 37.