may take his speech in 1737 against the Playhouse Bill as a sample of his oratory. I borrow from Lord Mahon:
"[The speech] contains many eloquent predictions, that, should the Bill be enacted, the ruin of liberty and the introduction of despotism would inevitably follow. Yet even Chesterfield owns that 'he has observed of late a remarkable licentiousness in the stage. In one play very lately acted (Pasquin[1]) the author thought fit to represent the three great professions, religion, physic, and law as inconsistent with common sense; in another (King Charles the First[2]), a most tragical story was brought upon the stage—a catastrophe too recent, too melancholy, and of too solemn a nature, to be heard of anywhere but from the pulpit. How these pieces came to pass unpunished, I do not know. . . The Bill, my Lords, may seem to be designed only against the stage; but to me it plainly appears to point somewhere else. It is an arrow that does but glance upon the stage: the mortal wound seems designed against the liberty of the press. By this Bill you prevent a play's being acted, but you do not prevent it being printed. Therefore if a
- ↑ ["Pasquin. A Dramatic Satire on the Times, by Henry Fielding. Acted at the Haymarket, 1736; 1740." (Baker.)]
- ↑ ["King Charles I. Hist Tr. by W. Havard, 1737." (Ibid.).]
