made moveable, when the said Pythagoras ascribed unto it motion.
Salv.We can think no other, if we do but consider the way he taketh to confute their assertion;Aristotle and Ptolomy seem to confute the mobility of the Earth against those who thought that it having a long time stood still, did begin to move in the time of Pythagoras the confutation of which consists in the demolition of buildings, and the tossing of stones, living creatures and men themselves up into the Air. And because such overthrows and extrusions cannot be made upon buildings and men, which were not before on the Earth, nor can men be placed, nor buildings erected upon the Earth, unlesse when it standeth still; hence therefore it is cleer, that Ptolomy argueth against those, who having granted the stability of the Earth for some time, that is, so long as living creatures, stones, and Masons were able to abide there, and to build Palaces and Cities, make it afterwards precipitately moveable to the overthrow and destructi- of Edifices, and living creatures, &c. For if he had undertook to dispute against such as had ascribed that revolution to the Earth from its first creation, he would have confuted them by saying, that if the Earth had alwayes moved, there could never have been placed upon it either men or stones; much less could buildings have been erected, or Cities founded, &c.
Simpl.I do not well conceive these Aristotelick and Ptolomaick inconveniences.
Salv.Ptolomey either argueth against those who have esteemed the Earth always moveable; or against such as have held that it stood for some time still, and hath since been set on moving. If against the first, he ought to say, that the Earth did not always move, for that then there would never have been men, animals, or edifices on the Earth, its vertigo not permitting them to stay thereon. But in that he arguing, saith that the Earth doth not move, because that beasts, men, and houses before plac'd on the Earth would precipitate, he supposeth the Earth to have been once in such a state, as that it did admit men and beasts to stay, and build thereon; the which draweth on the consequence, that it did for some time stand still, to wit, was apt for the abode of animals and erection of buildings. Do you now conceive what I would say?
Simpl.I do, and I do not: but this little importeth to the merit of the cause; nor can a small mistake of Ptolomey, committed through inadvertencie be sufficient to move the Earth, when it is immoveable. But omitting cavils, let us come to the substance of the argument, which to me seems unanswerable.
Salv.And I, Simplicius, will drive it home, and re-inforce it, by shewing yet more sensibly, that it is true that grave bodies turn'd with velocity about a settled centre, do acquire an impetus of moving, and receding to a distance from that centre, eventhen
