reading her own. This called forth questions, comments, and illustrations, on all sides. The style and manner, of course, in this age, are different, but the question, the high point from which it was considered, and the earnestness and simplicity of the discussion, as well as the gifts and graces of the speakers, gave it the charm of a Platonic dialogue. There was no pretension or pedantry in a word that was said. The tone of remark and question was simple as that of children in a school class; and, I believe, every one was gratified.”
The conversations thus opened proceeded with spirit
and success. Uuder the mythological forms, room was
found for opening all the great questions, on which
Margaret and her friends wished to converse. Prometheus
was made the type of Pure Reason; Jupiter, of Will;
Juno, the passive side of the same, or Obstinacy;
Minerva, Intellectual Power, Practical Reason; Mercury,
Executive Power, Understanding; Apollo was Genius,
the Sun; Bacchus was Geniality, the Earth’s answer.
“Apollo and Bacchus were contrasted,” says the reporter,
“Margaret unfolded her idea of Bacchus, His whole
life was triumph. Born from fire; a divine frenzy; the
answer of the earth to the sun, — of the warmth of joy
to the light of genius. He is beautiful, also; not severe
in youthful beauty, like Apollo; but exuberant, —
liable to excess. She spoke of the fables of his destroying
Pentheus, &c., and suggested the interpretations.
This Bacchus was found in Scripture. The Indian
Bacchus is glowing; he is the genial apprehensive
power; the glow of existence; mere joy.”
Venus was Grecian womanhood, instinctive; Diana, chastity; Mars, Grecian manhood, instinctive. Venus
