It will be noticed that those employed either by the House of Representatives or the Senate are referred to in this standing appropriation as "employees of the Legislative Assembly," even though their employment be effected by resolution of but one of the houses. Chap. 164, § 2, Laws of 1907. Payment is directed to be made "upon an account certified as correct by the presiding officers of the respective houses, duly attested by the secretary and chief clerk thereof, and when so audited and attested the State Auditor is authorized and directed draw his warrants therefor upon the State Treasurer." Section 30, R. C. 1905. In 1913 the section providing for the standing appropriation was amended. Chap. 28, S. L. 1913. It will be noted that as the section stood prior to 1913 it appropriated merely for the mileage and per diem of members and salaries of officers and employees. The amendment of 1913 made no substantial change in this, but it added to the appropriation an amount necessary to pay "the expenses of investigating committees when authorized by the Legislative Assembly, necessary postage, express, telegrams, telephone and such other miscellaneous expenses as may be authorized by the Legislative Assembly, except printing." Section 2 of chap. 28 is explanatory of the emergency that brought forth the amendment. It reads:
"This act shall be effective from January 1st, 1913, for the reason that at this time there appears to be no appropriation to cover the expense of the Legislative Assembly outside of printing and mileage, and per diem of members and per diem of officers and employees. The lack of an appropriation leaves the State Auditor without authority to open an account for legislative expense, and as it is important and necessary that expenses of this kind should be kept in a separate account for convenience for reference, this act shall be effective from January 1st, 1913, so that it may cover the 13th Legislative Assembly now in session."
The legislative expense of that year, 1913, was paid under the authority of § 35 as so amended; there being no provision in the general appropriation law covering the matter. All expenses of the character named have been paid out of this standing appropriation, and reference to the files in the Auditor's office discloses that among the expenses so paid upon vouchers approved by the officers of the House alone were expenses of the character of those involved in this case, incurred in connection with a certain bribery investigation involving only the House. In 1915 and subsequent legislative years there was included as a subdivision in the general appropriation bill specific appropriations covering the matters pre-
