Page:North Dakota Reports (vol. 48).pdf/469

This page needs to be proofread.
PETERSON v. OGLAND
445

They submitted in support of said motion an affidavit of each of the defendants, completely traversing all the statements in the affidavit for attachment, and showing that both of the defendants are residents of the state of North Dakota, own real and personal property therein, and that neither of them had committed, or were about to commit, any of the acts charged in the affidavit for attachment. Upon the hearing of the motion to discharge the attachment, the plaintiff and his wife were sworn and testified orally. Their testimony was to the effect that on the evening of April 12, 1921, the two defendants came to a room where plaintiff was then confined on the second floor of a building known as the Royal Cafe, in the city of Williston; that they wanted to see the plaintiff, but plaintiff's wife refused to admit them, and locked the door. She claimed that both of the defendants were intoxicated. According to her testimony they became quite angry because she would not let them see her husband. The defendants therg:pon went down stairs. And plaintiff and his wife testified that when the two defendants were on the sidewalk in front of the Royal Cafe, they (plaintiff and his wife) heard the defendant Isaac Ogland say: “I am going to get my car and get out of this country here and they can all go to hell.” At the time this statement was made, the car was in the possession of the chief of police of the city of Williston, who apparently, had taken charge of it in connection with some charges against defendants for violation, of the traffic regulations of the city of Williston. This constitutes the sole showing made by the plaintiff in support of the averments in the affidavit for attachment. Both defendants were also sworn and gave oral testimony. It appears from the testimony of the defendant Nels Ogland that he was and is the owner of real property in Williams county, N..D., with improvements thereon consisting of a house, barn, and other buildings, which is worth $4,000; and the owner of personal property, consisting of horses, cows, pigs, chickens, harnesses, household furniture, etc., worth $700; that said Nels Ogland was the owner of all of said property at and prior to the time the summons and complaint in this action were served upon him, and is still the owner of all of said property. It further appears that the said Nels Ogland is a widower, with five children to support and care for, and has resided in Williams county for the past 12 years. These facts are not disputed. The defendant Isaac Ogland testified positively—and on this point his testimony is not contradicted—that he is the owner of a house and lot in Crosby, N. D., where he has