paid to her husband, nor at the time that the conveyances were actually made to her, nor at any time before said agreement was fully completed between her and the defendant, Andrew Person.
VII. That said agreement, sale, and transfer of the property by the defendant Andrew Person to the defendant Edla R. Person were made in absolute good faith and without the intent on the part of either of said defendants to hinder, delay, defraud, or cheat the creditors of the defendant Andrew Person, or any other person whatsoever; that the said agreement was fair, and reasonable, and legal in all respects, and full consideration paid for the property conveyed.
VIII. That the plaintiff, the Union National Bank of Minot, has wholly and utterly failed to prove any fraud committed by the defendants, or either of the defendants, upon the part of the plaintiff, or any other person, in the transaction complained of or in the conveyance of the property described in the complaint by the defendant Andrew Person to the defendant Edla R. Person, or any of the property agreed to be transferred and subsequently conveyed in the agreement made between the defendants in May, 1916; that the delay in finally completing said agreement between the defendants does not evidence or raise any presumption of fraud between said defendants, but, on the contrary, raises a presumption of good faith, and the belief of the defendants themselves in their right to make the transaction, and to make it in their own way, and at the times it was convenient to them, having no fear of any intervention by any creditor or any other person who might object thereto, and does not manifest a disposition on the part of the defendants to transfer property in haste in order to defeat creditors.
IX. That this is an action to set aside a conveyance in fraud of creditors, and to establish a lien of the creditors upon the premises described in the complaint.
X. That the plaintiff has no right, title, estate, claim, lien, or demand in or to the premises hereinafter and in said complaint described of any kind, nature, or description whatsoever, and is forever debarred and enjoined from asserting or claiming any thereto.
XI. That all and singular the allegations of the answer are true, and the same are hereby adopted as additional findings of fact, and that the defendant Edla R. Person is the owner in fee simple of and to the real estate described in the complaint, to wit: Lots numbered 7 and 8 in block numbered 40 of the Northern Pacific Second addition to the city
