pose of taxing their corporate excess, and has prescribed an entirely separate and distinct method for obtaining the valuation of bank stock for the purpose of its taxation.
The valuation of each having thus. been ascertained, unless exempted as the stock of corporations, joint-stock companies and associations other than banks, by chap. 62 as it now is, it is subject to taxation the same as other personal property, unless a different tax is by law specified.
It may further be observed that at the same legislative session that enacted chap. 61 there was also enacted chap. 230, and that both were approved on the same day, to wit, March 9th. Neither of these laws contained an emergency clause, and hence became effective on the same date, July 1, 1917.
Section 1 of chap. 230 provides that—
“‘Money’ and ‘credits’ as the same are defined in § 2074 of the Compiled Laws of 1913, including bonds and stocks, are hereby exempted from taxation other than that imposed by this act, and shall hereafter be subject to an annual tax of three mills on each dollar of the fair cash value thereof. But nothing in this act shall apply to money or credits belonging to incorporated banks or building and loan associations situated in this state, nor to any indebtedness on which the tax is paid under a mortgage registration act, or is exempted by statute.”
It will be noticed that the legislature by this section was careful to except banks from the operation of that law.
It is too clear to admit of any controversy that the policy and intent of the legislature to deal with the taxation of bank stock, and that of other companies or associations separately, is clearly manifested by the enactment of the two chapters last mentioned at the same session, where by one the stock of state banks, as had theretofore always been done. was placed in a separate and distinct class for the purpose of assessment and taxation, and by the other the stock of companies and associations other than state banks were placed in an equally separate and distinct class.
If this were not true chap. 61 would not, we assume, have been enacted. It cannot be successfully contended that it was enacted inadvertently. It cannot be said that the Legislature did not have a distinct purpose in its enactment.
Section 1 of chap. 255, Session Laws of 1915, provides:
“’Money’ and ‘credits’ as the same are defined in § 2074 of the
