high as a tall horse; and Catesby, that it is about the bigness of a middle-sized ox.[1] I have seen a skeleton 7 feet high, and from good information believe they are often considerably higher. The Elk of Europe is not two-thirds of his height. The wesel is larger in America than in Europe, as may be seen by comparing its dimensions as reported by Mons. D'Aubenton and Kalm.[2] The latter tells us that the lynx, badger, red fox, and flying squirrel, are the same in America as in Europe; by which expression I understand they are the same in all material circumstances, in size as well as others; for if they were smaller, they would differ from the European.[3] Our grey fox is, by Catesby's account, little different in size and shape from the European fox.[4] I presume he means the red fox of Europe, as does Kalm, where he says,[5] that in size “they do not quite come up to our foxes.” For proceeding next to the red fox of America, he says “they are entirely the same with the European sort;” which shews he had in view one European sort only, which was the red. So that the result of their testimony is, that the American grey fox is somewhat less than the European red; which is equally true of the grey fox of Europe, as may be seen by comparing the measures of the Count de Buffon and Mons. D'Aubenton.[6] The white bear of America is as large as that of Europe. The bones of the mammoth, which have been found in America, are as large as those found in the old world. It may be asked, why I insert the mammoth, as if it still existed? I ask in return why I should omit it, as if it did not exist? Such is the economy of Nature, that no instance can be produced of her having permitted any one race of her animals to become extinct; of her having formed any link in her great work so weak as to be broken. To add to this, the traditionary testimony of the Indians, that this animal
- ↑ This sentence in the first edition began as follows: “Kalm tells us that the
Black Moose or Renne of America is as high as a tall horse,” &c. The author
corrected it as in the text, appending a marginal note in these words: “This is not
correct. Kalm considers the Moose as the Elk, and not as the Renne. Musu is the
Algonkin name of the Orignal, or Elk.”—I. xxvii.
” - ↑ Xv. 42.
- ↑ I. 359. I. 48, 221, 251. II. 52.
- ↑ II. 78.
- ↑ I. 220.
- ↑ Xxvii. 63.; xiv. 119. Harris, II. 387. Buffon, Quad, ix., 1.
