Page:Nullification Controversy in South Carolina.djvu/41

This page has been proofread, but needs to be validated.
22
Nullificatian Controversy in South Carolina

also manufactured other sorts of cloth for winter or summer clothes for negroes, and cotton bagging, "at prices most essentially anti-tariff," said "Homespun." The writer endeavored to show how South Carolina had at her command every means for avoiding extravagant duties.[1] Other writers recommended the manufacture of cottonseed oil and the culture of the vine to help lighten the burden of the tariff. During this year and the next, noticeable attention was directed to agricultiural improvements, and announcement was made of an agricultural paper which was to begin publication on January 1, 1830.[2]

While some writers were in sympathy with all suggestions and efforts which might enable the planters to bear up against the tariff, they contended that the iniquity of protectionism itself must never for a moment be forgotten. They believed that substitutes and experiments might produce temporary alleviation, but that the South could never be permanently prosperous until the restrictive policy was destroyed. Many writers deprecated the plans of non-consumption and

  1. Courier, January 26, 1829.
  2. Mercury, September 23, October, 1829; Courier, November 10. The Southern Planter and Practical Agriculturist was to be a monthly of 44 or 48 pages.