the same direction being done by Mr. Hodge, a mission- ary whose efforts are leaving their impress on those who come in contact with him. Mr. Hodge is a co- operative enthusiast and probably considers that the result which he sees flowing from his efforts are due to the working of co-operation. I, who was able to watch the efforts, had no hesitation in inferring that the personal equation counted for success in the one and failure in the other instance.
I am an enthusiast myself, rut twenty-five years of experimenting and experience have made me a cautious and discriminating enthusiast. Workers in a cause necessarily, though quite unconciously, exaggerate its merits and often succeed in turning its very defects into advantages. In spite of my caution I consider the little institution I am con- ducting in Ahmedabad as the finest thing in the world. It alone gives me sufficient inspiration. Cri- tics tell me that it represents a soulless soul-force and that its severe discipline has made it merely mechanical. I suppose both the critics and I are wrong. It is, at best, a humble attempt to place at the disposal of the nation a home where men and women may have scope for free and unfettered development of character, in keeping with the national genius, and, if its controllers do not take care, the discipline that is the foundation of character may frustrate the very end in view. I would venture, therefore, to warn enthusiasts in co-operation against entertaining false hopes.
With Sir Daniel Hamilton it has become a religion. On the 13th January last, he addressed the students of the Scottish Churches College and, in order to point a moral, he instanced Scotland's poverty of two hundred
�� �
