attention, not as an end in itself, but for the sake of the culture sequence of which it is the most convenient index. Another is that our subject is essentially an historical one, the only rational approach to which is backward through the cross-section made in it by the discovery of America.
1. Brinton, 1882. II, 1885. II; Brasseur de Bourbourg, 1861. I.
2. Morley, 1915. I.
3. Morley, 1915. I.
4. Markham, 1910. I, pp. 309–310.
5. Anales de Cuauhtitlan, 1886. I.
6. Mooney, 1898. I.
7. Brinton, 1885. I.
8. Brinton, 1890. I.
9. Sapir, 1916. I.
10. Uhle, 1903. I.
11. Spinden, 1915. I.
12. Nelson, N. C., 1916. I.
13. Parker, 1916. II.
14. Sterns, 1915. I.
15. Volk, 1911. I.
16. Spier, 1916. I.
17. Smith, H. I., 1910. II.
18. Nelson, N. C., 1909. I; 1910. I
19. Nelson. N. C., 1917. I.
20. Spier, 1916. I.
21. Sapir, 1916. I.
22. Boas, 1907. I.
23. Spinden, 1913. I.
24. Lowie, 1916. II.
25. Hatt, 1914. I; 1916. I.
26. Boas, 1907. I.
27. Thalbitzer, 1914. I.
28. Hatt, 1916. I.
29. Spinden, 1913. I.
30. Lowie, 1916. II.
31. Mooney, 1896. I.
