Page:The Rhind Mathematical Papyrus, Volume I.pdf/208

This page has been proofread, but needs to be validated.

CHRONOLOGICAL LIST OF DOCUMENTS DISCUSSED

In more than one case the dates assigned below can be only very approximate; for example, since the Akhmim papyrus is probably not earlier than 600, nor later than 900, the year half way between these years has been given. When printed sources gave no dates the leading living authorities were consulted for determining them. An attempt has been made to adjust to recent scholarship the dates in printed sources.

Approximate Dates B. C. Documents Locations
3500 Hierakonopolis mace (hieroglyphic) Oxford
2200 Babylonian tablet 10201 from Nippur[1] (?) (cuneiform) Philadelphia
2200 Tello tablet survey (cuneiform) Constantinople
2150 Babylonian tablet 12648 from Nippur (?) (cuneiform) Philadelphia
2070 Babylonian tablets (25) from Nippur (?) (cuneiform) Philadelphia
2000 Akkadian clay tablet (cuneiform) Berlin (?)
2000 Akhmim tablets 25367, 25368 (hieratic) Cairo
2000 Geometrical tablet 15285 (cuneiform) London
2000 Mathematical tablets 85194, 85210 (cuneiform) London
1900 Babylonian tablet CBS 8536 (cuneiform) Philadelphia
1900 Book of the Dead, Introduction to Section 99, Berlin 9 and Cairo 28023 (hieratic) Berlin and Cairo
1900 Kahun counting stick 372-59 (hieroglyphic) London
1850 Golenishchev mathematical papyrus (hieratic) Moscow
1850 Kahun papyri (hieratic) London
1850 Thebes papyrus 6619 (hieratic) Berlin
1800 Babylonian tablet 19797 from Nippur[2] (?) (cuneiform) Philadelphia
1700 Bulak papyrus 11, 18 (hieratic) Cairo
1650 Leather roll 10250[3] (hieratic) London
1650 Rhind mathematical papyrus 10057, 10058 (hieratic) London
1650 Rhind papyrus fragments 265 to go between 10057, 10058, above (hieratic) New York
1650 Tablet 7798 (hieroglyphic) Berlin
1465 Papyri 9784, 9785 (hieratic) Berlin
  1. A question mark is here added because many assyriologists are in doubt as to whether some tablets, claimed by Hilprecht to have come from Nippur, were ever there.
  2. Transcribed but not interpreted.
  3. Wholly unpublished.