fight and die to advance the wealth and luxury of the great, and they are called masters of the world without having a sod to call their own.
Is it not just that what belongs to the people should be shared by the people? Is a man with no capacity for fighting more useful to his country than a soldier? Is a citizen inferior to a slave? Is an alien, or one who owns some of his country’s soil, the best patriot? You have won by war most of your possessions, and hope to acquire the rest of the habitable globe. But now it is but a hazard whether you gain the rest by bravery or whether by your weakness and discords you are robbed of what you have by your foes. Wherefore, in prospect of such acquisitions, you should if need be spontaneously, and of your own free will, yield up these lands to those who will rear children for the service of the State. Do not sacrifice a great thing while striving for a small, especially as you are to receive no contemptible compensation for your expenditure on the land, in free ownership of five hundred jugera secure forever, and in case you have sons, of two hundred and fifty more for each of them.
The person of a tribune, I acknowledge, is sacred and inviolable,[1] because he is consecrated
- ↑ Tiberius, having deposed one of his colleags, a tribune, caused offense in that he "had robbed that high office of its dignity." He then, says Plutarch, "called the commons together again," and
32
