"Quant à M. Dumas, tout le monde sait sa verve prodigieuse, son entrain facile, son bonheur de misc-en-scène, son dialogue spirituel, et toujours en mouvement, ce récit léger qui court sans cesse et qui sait enlever l'obstacle et l'espace sans jamais faiblir. Il couvre d'immense toiles sans fatiguer jamais ni son pinceau ni son lecteur."
Similarly, Desiré Nisard sneered at Dumas, in his attack on what he called the "easy" literature. It is characteristic of the French critic, this inability to see that for certain kinds of composition rapidity of thought and writing are essential to success. In short, the austere devotion to "form" and "style" which his countrymen profess and demand in others have always prevented Dumas, who cared little for either quality, from achieving honour in his own country except, of course, from the ignorant public, who read him and enjoyed him.
The weight of official authority being cast against us, it is obvious that our own attempt to estimate the extent and value of Dumas's genius must firstly take more or less the form of a defence, in which we must pass in review the charges brought against our client, and produce evidence in support.
It is not at all our desire to deny all the accusations brought against Dumas; we hope, however, that we shall be allowed to extenuate some things, and be pardoned for setting down naught in malice.
