104
MEDICAL TOPOGRAPHY OF MALVERN,
The maximum, minimum, mean, and the range of the barometer, for each month in the year, (from June, 1834, to June, 1835,) at London and Malvern.
LONDON. | MALVREN | ||||||||
Max. | Min. | Mean. | range. | Max. | Min. | Mean. | range. | ||
1835— | January | 30.759 | 29.031 | 30.048 | 1.728 | 30.158 | 28.359 | 29.455 | 1.799 |
February | 30.417 | 29.178 | 29.796 | 1.239 | 29.376 | 28.526 | 29.156 | 1.350 | |
March | 30.513 | 28.797 | 29.903 | 1.716 | 29.913 | 28.192 | 29.274 | 1.721 | |
April | 30.429 | 29.475 | 30.077 | 0.954 | 29.873 | 28.965 | 29.526 | 0.908 | |
May | 30.123 | 29.427 | 29.813 | 0.696 | 29.590 | 28.850 | 29.243 | 07.40 | |
1834— | June | 30.325 | 29.597 | 29.930 | 0.728 | 29.746 | 28.953 | 29.332 | 0.793 |
July | 30.213 | 29.396 | 29.876 | 0.817 | 29.665 | 28.892 | 29.269 | 0.773 | |
August | 30.109 | 29.593 | 29.819 | 0.516 | 29.572 | 28.955 | 29.245 | 0.617 | |
September | 30.461 | 29.315 | 30.026 | 1.146 | 29.877 | 28.740 | 29.425 | 1.137 | |
October | 30.619 | 29.237 | 29.996 | 1.382 | 30.027 | 28.734 | 29.401 | 1.293 | |
November | 30.379 | 29.141 | 29.904 | 1.238 | 29.883 | 28.586 | 29.331 | 1.297 | |
December | 30.576 | 29.215 | 30.265 | 1.361 | 30.043 | 28.611 | 29.700 | 1.432 |
The mean height and the mean range of the barometer, at London and Malvern, in the spring, summer, autumn, and winter, before stated.
SPRING. | SUMMER. | AUTUMN. | WINTER. | |||||
Mean height. |
Mean range. |
Mean height. |
Mean range. |
Mean height. |
Mean range. |
Mean height. |
Mean range. | |
London | 29.931 | 1.122 | 29.875 | 0.687 | 29.975 | 1.255 | 30.036 | 1.443 |
Malvern | 29.348 | 1.123 | 29.282 | 0.727 | 29.385 | 1.242 | 29.435 | 1.527 |
Mean height and mean range of the barometer for the year.[1]
Mean height. | Mean range. | |
London | 29.954 | 1.127 in. |
Malvern | 29.362 | 1.155 in. |
- ↑ Mr. Daniell from an average of three years' observations, makes the mean height of the barometer in London 29.881. The mean of twenty years, deduced by Mr. Howard is 29365. The above result does not vary much from Mr. Daniell's, nor greatly from Howard's.