This page has been proofread, but needs to be validated.

Put . From N we let fall the perpendicular NP upon MT, then we construct the perpendicular NR upon NP in N, then we lay off the line MS = 1 upon MT, and from S we let fall the perpendicular SR upon NR. If we additionally make NU = PS, then NU will be parallel to MT in the Lobachevskian sense, and this parallel encloses with the X-axis the angle .

As point U always lies between S and R, it can be easily seen from the figure that in relativity theory is smaller than of ordinary mechanics.

In Einstein's formula for aberration,

(32)

we denote the cosines on the left-hand side and in the numerator of the fraction by corresponding sines, then we square and get in this way after some transformations

(33)

During the motion of earth in its orbit relative to the fixed stars as reference frame we have .[1] For such small velocities we can neglect , and then we obtain

(34)

Formula (34) and formula (32), in which we will take instead of , give

(35)

from which we can, in accordance with the ordinary theory, easily find the formula

(36)

By comparison of formulas (33) and (34) we find

(37)

However, if we take in Fig. 3 , then we can put

(38)

If would even be better, if Fig. 1 of my first treatise is used. Then we can take

(39)

7. Light pressure

The following remarks are related to Einstein's formulas located in § 8 of his first paper on the relativity principle[2]. We can easily see that

(40)

and this can be interpreted, as earlier , by using Fig. 6.

For light pressure, Einstein gave the formula

(41)

We transform them at first into the form

from which we easily obtain

(42)

If we take a Lobachevskian right angled triangle with hypotenuse and an acute angle , then we obtain for the side adjacent to angle α, the expression

(43)

hence

(44)
Agram, February 12, 1910

(Received February 18, 1910)

  1. Brill, Einführung in die Mechanik, 1909, p. 206.
  2. Ann. der Phys. 17, 913-915. 1905