Page:William John Sparrow-Simpson - Roman Catholic Opposition to Papal Infallibility (1909).djvu/120

This page has been proofread, but needs to be validated.
100
OPPOSITION IN ENGLAND
[CHAP.

constituted no part of their principles, religion, or belief.[1] Among these they rejected the theory that excommunicated princes may be deposed or murdered by their subjects. They declared that no ecclesiastical power whatever can absolve subjects from allegiance to lawful temporal authority.[2] They wrote: "We believe that no act that is in itself immoral or dishonest can ever be justified by or under colour that it is done either for the good of the Church or in obedience to any ecclesiastical power whatever."[3] And—what now particularly concerns us here—they said: "We acknowledge no Infallibility in the Pope."

This protestation of the Roman Catholics of England brought about the passing of the Relief Act of 1791. The representative character of the document may be realised from the fact that it was signed by all the four Vicars Apostolic; that is by all the highest Roman authorities in England, by 240 priests; and in all by 1,523 members of the Anglo-Roman body, among whom most of the educated and influential laity were included. It would be interesting to ascertain what proportion the 240 priests bore to the total number of Roman clergy in this land. Accurate statistics are not easily obtained. The Committee of English Romanists claimed that the total number of Roman priests in England did not exceed 260. Berington, in 1780, estimated the number as nearer 360, of whom 110 were ex-Jesuits. From these figures it would appear that, if the Jesuits are left out, nearly the whole body of Roman Clergy in England, including their four Bishops, committed themselves frankly to rejection of Papal Infallibility.[4]

  1. See Butler, Historical Memoirs of the English Catholics, vol. ii. p. 117.
  2. Ibid. p. 118.
  3. Ibid. p. 119.
  4. Bernard Ward, Dawn of the Catholic Revival, i. p. 151.