A Dynamical Theory of the Electromagnetic Field/Part VII
PART VII. — CALCULATION OF THE COEFFICIENTS OF ELECTROMAGNETIC INDUCTION.
General Methods.
(109) The electromagnetic relations between two conducting circuits, A and B, depend upon a function M of their form and relative position, as has been already shown.
M may be calculated in several different ways, which must of course all lead to the same result.
First Method. M is the electromagnetic momentum of the circuit B when A carries a unit current, or
where F, G, H are the components of electromagnetic momentum due to a unit current in A, and is an element of length of B, and the integration is performed round the circuit of B.
To find F, G, H, we observe that by (B) and (C)
with corresponding equations for G and H, , and being the components of the current in A.
Now if we consider only a single element of A, we shall have
and the solution of the equation gives
where is the distance of any point from . Hence
where is the angle between the directions of the two elements , and is the distance between them, and the integration is performed round both circuits.
In this method we confine our attention during integration to the two linear circuits alone.
(110) Second Method. M is the number of lines of magnetic force which pass through the circuit B when A carries a unit current, or
where , are the components of magnetic induction due to unit current in A, S' is a surface bounded by the current B, and are the direction-cosines of the normal to the surface, the integration being extended over the surface.
We may express this in the form
where S' is an element of the surface bounded by B, is an element of the circuit A, is the distance between them, and are the angles between and and between and the normal to S' respectively, and is the angle between the planes in which and are measured. The integration is performed round the circuit A and over the surface bounded by B.
This method is most convenient in the case of circuits lying in one plane, in which case sin , and .
111. Third Method. M is that part of the intrinsic magnetic energy of the whole field which depends on the product of the currents in the two circuits, each current being unity.
Let be the components of magnetic intensity at any point due to the first circuit, the same for the second circuit; then the intrinsic energy of the element of volume V of the field is
The part which depends on the product of the currents is
Hence if we know the magnetic intensities I and I' due to unit current in each circuit, we may obtain M by integrating
over all space, where is the angle between the directions of I and I'.
Application to a Coil.
(112) To find the coefficient (M) of mutual induction between two circular linear conductors in parallel planes, the distance between the curves being everywhere the same, and small compared with the radius of either.
If be the distance between the curves, and the radius of either, then when is very small compared with , we find by the second method, as a first approximation,
To approximate more closely to the value of M, let and be the radii of the circles, and the distance between their planes; then
We obtain M by considering the following conditions: –
1st. M must fulfil the differential equation
This equation being true for any magnetic field symmetrical with respect to the common axis of the circles, cannot of itself lead to the determination of M as a function of , and . We therefore make use of other conditions.
2ndly. The value of M must remain the same when and are exchanged.
3rdly. The first two terms of M must be the same as those given above.
M may thus be expanded in the following series:—
(113) We may apply this result to find the coefficient of self-induction (L) of a circular coil of wire whose section is small compared with the radius of the circle.
Let the section of the coil be a rectangle, the breadth in the plane of the circle being c, and the depth perpendicular to the plane of the circle being .
Let the mean radius of the coil be , and the number of windings ; then we find, by integrating,
where means the value of M for the two windings whose coordinates are and respectively; and the integration is performed first with respect to and over the rectangular section, and then with respect to and over the same space.
Here | mean radius of the coil. |
„ | diagonal of the rectangular section |
„ | angle between and the plane of the circle. |
„ | n number of windings. |
The logarithms are Napierian, and the angles are in circular measure.
In the experiments made by the Committee of the British Association for determining a standard of Electrical Resistance, a double coil was used, consisting of two nearly equal coils of rectangular section, placed parallel to each other, with a small interval between them.
The value of L for this coil was found in the following way.
The value of L was calculated by the preceding formula for six different cases, in which the rectangular section considered has always the same breadth, while the depth was
A, B, C, A+B, B+C, A+B+C,
and in each case. Calling the results
L(A), L(B), L(C),&c,
we calculate the coefficient of mutual induction M(AC) of the two coils thus,
Then if is the number of windings in the coil A and in the coil B, the coefficient of self-induction of the two coils together is
(114) These values of L are calculated on the supposition that the windings of the wire are evenly distributed so as to fill up exactly the whole section. This, however, is not the case, as the wire is generally circular and covered with insulating material. Hence the current in the wire is more concentrated than it would have been if it had been distributed uniformly over the section, and the currents in the neighbouring wires do not act on it exactly as such a uniform current would do.
The corrections arising from these considerations may be expressed as numerical quantities, by which we must multiply the length of the wire, and they are the same whatever be the form of the coil.
Let the distance between each wire and the next, on the supposition that they are arranged in square order, be D, and let the diameter of the wire be d, then the correction for diameter of wire is
The correction for the eight nearest wires is
+0.0236.
For the sixteen in the next row
+0.00083.
These corrections being multiplied by the length of wire and added to the former result, give the true value of L, considered as the measure of the potential of the coil on itself for unit current in the wire when that current has been established for some time, and is uniformly distributed through the section of the wire.
(115) But at the commencement of a current and during its variation the current is not uniform throughout the section of the wire, because the inductive action between different portions of the current tends to make the current stronger at one part of the section than at another. When a uniform electromotive force P arising from any cause
acts on a cylindrical wire of specific resistance , we have
where F is got from the equation
being the distance from the axis of the cylinder.
Let one term of the value of F be of the form , where T is a function of the time, then the term of which produced it is of the form
Hence if we write
The total counter current of self-induction at any point is
from to .
from to .
Also if be the length of the wire, and R its resistance,
and if C be the current when established in the wire, .
The total counter current may be written
by § (35).
Now if the current instead of being variable from the centre to the circumference of the section of the wire had been the same throughout, the value of F would have been
where is the current in the wire at any instant, and the total countercurrent would have been
, say.
Hence
or the value of L which must be used in calculating the self-induction of a wire for variable currents is less than that which is deduced from the supposition of the current being constant throughout the section of the wire by , where is the length of the wire, and is the coefficient of magnetic induction for the substance of the wire.
(116) The dimensions of the coil used by the Committee of the British Association in their experiments at King's College in 1864 were as follows:—
metre. | ||
Mean radius | .158194 | |
Depth of each coil | .01608 | |
Breadth of each coil | .01841 | |
Distance between the coils | = | .02010 |
Number of windings | 313 | |
Diameter of wire | = | .00126 |
The value of L derived from the first term of the expression is 437440 metres.
The correction depending on the radius not being infinitely great compared with the section of the coil as found from the second term is —7345 metres.
The correction depending on the diameter of the wire is per unit of length | +.44997 |
Correction of eight neighbouring wires | +.0236 |
For sixteen wires next to these | +.0008 |
Correction for variation of current in different parts of section | -.2500 |
Total correction per unit of length | .22437 |
Length | 311.236 metres. |
Sum of corrections of this kind | 70 „ |
Final value of L by calculation | 430165 „ |
This value of L was employed in reducing the observations, according to the method explained in the Report of the Committee^{[1]}. The correction depending on L varies as the square of the velocity. The results of sixteen experiments to which this correction had been applied, and in which the velocity varied from 100 revolutions in seventeen seconds to 100 in seventy-seven seconds, were compared by the method of least squares to determine what further correction depending on the square of the velocity should be applied to make the outstanding errors a minimum.
The result of this examination showed that the calculated value of L should be multiplied by 1.0618 to obtain the value of L, which would give the most consistent results."
We have therefore L by calculation | 430165 metres. |
Probable value of L by method of least squares | 456748 „ |
Result of rough experiment with the Electric Balance (see § 46) | 410000 „ |
The value of L calculated from the dimensions of the coil is probably much more accurate than either of the other determinations.
- ↑ British Association Reports, 1863, p. 169.