Arthur v. Herold/Opinion of the Court

Arthur v. Herold
Opinion of the Court by Morrison Waite
745415Arthur v. Herold — Opinion of the CourtMorrison Waite

United States Supreme Court

100 U.S. 75

Arthur  v.  Herold


We think it was not error for the court to say to the jury that ground chicory was the same thing as burnt chicory. The chicory root cannot be ground until it is burned, and burnt chicory is not an article of commerce until it is ground. Whether or not the article imported was a new preparation, and something other than ground chicory, that is to say, whether it was prepared chicory and not simply ground chicory, was a question of fact that was properly left to the jury.

Judgment affirmed.

Notes edit

This work is in the public domain in the United States because it is a work of the United States federal government (see 17 U.S.C. 105).

Public domainPublic domainfalsefalse