Brotherhood of Locomotive Firemen & Enginemen v. Chicago, Rock Island & Pacific Railroad Company/Dissent Douglas

Court Documents
Case Syllabus
Opinion of the Court
Dissenting Opinion
Douglas
 Wikipedia article

United States Supreme Court

393 U.S. 129

Brotherhood of Locomotive Firemen & Enginemen  v.  Chicago, Rock Island & Pacific Railroad Company

 Argued: Oct. 22, 1968. --- Decided: Nov 18, 1968


Mr. Justice DOUGLAS, dissenting.

I would agree with the Court that if the constitutionality of these Arkansas laws were to be judged as safety measures under the State's police power, they would have to be sustained. But as I indicated in my dissent in Brotherhood of Locomotive Engineers v. Chicago, R.I. & P.R. Co., 382 U.S. 423, 438, 86 S.Ct. 594, 601, 15 L.Ed.2d 501, Congress in enacting Pub.L. 88-108, 77 Stat. 132, undertook to displace state 'full-crew' laws by delegating power to a national arbitration board to determine, for example, the necessity of firemen on diesel freights and the minimum size of train and switching crews.

I would, therefore, remand the cases to the District Court for further proceedings consistent with Pub.L. 88-108 and the awards that have been made under it.

Notes

edit

This work is in the public domain in the United States because it is a work of the United States federal government (see 17 U.S.C. 105).

Public domainPublic domainfalsefalse