Curran v. Arkansas/Dissent Catron

Curran v. Arkansas, 56 U.S. 304 (1853)
Dissenting opinion by John Catron
2799924Curran v. Arkansas, 56 U.S. 304 (1853) — Dissenting opinionJohn Catron
Court Documents
Case Syllabus
Opinion of the Court
Dissenting Opinions
Catron
Daniel

[p321] . . .

Mr. Justice CATRON.

As this case comes up from a State court under the 25th section of the judiciary act, the first question presented is, whether we have jurisdiction to decide the merits; and I am of opinion, that no violation of any contract rendered, which the complainant sets up a right to recover, has occurred within the sense of the Constitution, by the laws passed by the State of Arkansas, and which laws are complained of in the bill.

On the merits, I have formed no opinion, not having authority to inquire into them, as I apprehend.