Dayton-Goose Creek Railway Company v. United States


Dayton-Goose Creek Railway Company v. United States
by William Howard Taft
Syllabus
869144Dayton-Goose Creek Railway Company v. United States — SyllabusWilliam Howard Taft
Court Documents

United States Supreme Court

263 U.S. 456

Dayton-Goose Creek Railway Company  v.  United States

 Argued: Nov. 16-19, 1923. --- Decided: Jan 7 1924

Messrs. Frank Andrews, of Houston, Tex., Robert J. Carey, of New York City, and Robert H. Kelley, of Houston, Tex., for appellant.

[Syllabus and Argument of Counsels from pages 456-464 intentionally omitted]

Mr. P. J. Farrell, of Washington, D. C., for Interstate Commerce Commission.

[Argument of Counsel from pages 464-466 intentionally omitted]

Mr. Solicitor General Beck, of Washington, D. C., for the United States.

[Argument of Counsel from pages 466-474 intentionally omitted]

Mr. Chief Justice TAFT delivered the opinion of the Court.

Notes edit

This work is in the public domain in the United States because it is a work of the United States federal government (see 17 U.S.C. 105).

Public domainPublic domainfalsefalse