915057Dayton v. Dulles — DissentTom C. Clark
Court Documents
Case Syllabus
Opinion of the Court
Dissenting Opinion
Clark

United States Supreme Court

357 U.S. 144

Dayton  v.  Dulles

 Argued: April 10, 1958. --- Decided: June 16, 1958


Mr. Justice CLARK, with whom Mr. Justice BURTON, Mr. Justice HARLAN and Mr. Justice WHITTAKER concur, dissenting.

On the grounds stated in my dissent to Kent v. Dulles, 78 S.Ct. 1120, 1121, also decided this day, I think the Secretary of State is authorized to deny a passport to an applicant who is going abroad with the purpose of engaging in activities that would advance the Communist cause. Because the majority does not consider any of the constitutional issues raised by petitioner, it would be inappropriate for me, as a dissenter, to consider them at this time. Cf. Peters v. Hobby, 1955, 349 U.S. 331, 353-357, 75 S.Ct. 790, 801-803, 99 L.Ed. 1129. Accordingly, I would affirm on the question of authority without reaching any constitutional issue.

Notes edit

This work is in the public domain in the United States because it is a work of the United States federal government (see 17 U.S.C. 105).

Public domainPublic domainfalsefalse