Open main menu
Court Documents
Case Syllabus
Opinion of the Court
Concurring Opinions
Burger
Douglas
Dissenting Opinions
White
Rehnquist

Mr. Justice Rehnquist, dissenting.

The holding in Roe v. Wade, ante, p. 113, that state abortion laws can withstand constitutional scrutiny only if the State can demonstrate a compelling state interest, apparently compels the Court's close scrutiny of the various provisions in Georgia's abortion statute. Since, as indicated by my dissent in Wade, I view the compelling-state-interest standard as an inappropriate measure of the constitutionality of state abortion laws, I respectfully dissent from the majority's holding.