Estep v. United States
by William O. Douglas
Syllabus
899991Estep v. United States — SyllabusWilliam O. Douglas
Court Documents
Concurring Opinions
Murphy
Rutledge
Frankfurter
Dissenting Opinion
Burton

United States Supreme Court

327 U.S. 114

Estep  v.  United States

 Argued: Nov. 7, 1945. --- Decided: Feb 4, 1946

The duty to report for induction in accordance with draft board's order includes duty to submit to induction, and breach of such duty is a crime as defined by provision of Selective Service Act making criminal a willful failure to perform any duty required of a registrant by the act or the rules and regulations made under it. Selective Training and Service Ac of 1940, § 11, 50 U.S.C.A.Appendix § 311.

Mr.Hayden C. Covington, of Brooklyn, N.Y., for petitioners.

Mr. Irving S. Shapiro, of Washington, D.C., for respondent.

Mr. Justice DOUGLAS delivered the opinion of the Court.

Notes edit

This work is in the public domain in the United States because it is a work of the United States federal government (see 17 U.S.C. 105).

Public domainPublic domainfalsefalse