Farmer v. Arabian American Oil Company/Dissent Harlan

by John Marshall Harlan II

United States Supreme Court

379 U.S. 227

Farmer  v.  Arabian American Oil Company

 Argued: Nov. 9 and 10, 1964. --- Decided: Dec 14, 1964

Mr. Justice HARLAN, with whom Mr. Justice STEWART joins, dissenting.

The only possible justification for bringing this case here was to settle the question of whether the 100-mile subpoena rule deprives a district court of power to tax as costs the traveling expenses of witnesses reasonably brought by the prevailing litigant from places beyond that distance. The Court, however, declines to make any precise holding on this question. The scope of the discretion of a district judge acting within his powers, which is the foundation of today's decision, is in my opinion a matter which should be left with the courts of appeals. I would affirm the judgment below for the reasons stated in the opinion of Chief Judge Lumbard for the majority of the Court of Appeals, 324 F.2d 359.

Notes