First National Bank in Plant City v. Dickinson/Dissent Stewart

by Potter Stewart

United States Supreme Court

396 U.S. 122

First National Bank in Plant City  v.  Dickinson

 Argued: Oct. 16, 1969. --- Decided: Dec 9, 1969

Mr. Justice STEWART, dissenting.

I wholly agree with the Court that federal law is to be applied in determining whether the activities of a national bank constitute branch banking under the exclusive definition contained in the National Bank Act, 12 U.S.C. § 36(f). Whether the activities here in question constitute branch banking under that standard seems to me an extremely close question. That being so, I would defer to the determination of the Comptroller of the Currency. He is the official charged with administering these provisions of the Act, and I cannot say his determination was not a reasonable one. See Udall v. Tallman, 380 U.S. 1, 16-18, 85 S.Ct. 792, 801-802, 13 L.Ed.2d 616.

Notes