Open main menu

Gracie v. Palmer (21 U.S. 699)/Opinion of the Court

< Gracie v. Palmer (21 U.S. 699)

United States Supreme Court

21 U.S. 699

GRACIE et al. Plaintiffs in Error,  v.  PALMER et al. Defendants in Error.

MR. WEBSTER moved to dismiss the writ of error in this case, for want of jurisdiction. He stated that the plaintiffs below, Palmer and others, were described to be aliens, and subjects of the King of Great Britain, and the defendants, Gracie and others, to be citizens of the state of New York; and the suit was brought in the Circuit Court of Pennsylvania. It did not appear that the defendants were inhabitants of, or found in the district of Pennsylvania, at the time of serving the writ; and he therefore contended, under the eleventh section of the Judiciary Act of 1789, c, 20, that no civil suit could be brought against them by original process in that district.

Mr. Chief Justice Marshall stated that the uniform construction, under the clause of the act referred to, had been that it was not necessary to aver, on the record, that the defendant was an inhabitant of the district, or found therein. That [p700] it was sufficient if the Court appeared to have jurisdiction by the citizenship or alienage of the parties. The exemption from arrest in a district in which the defendant was not an inhabitant, or in which he was not found at the time of serving the process, was the privilege of the defendant, which he might waive by a voluntary appearance. That if process was returned by the marshal as served upon him within the district, it was sufficient, and that where the defendant voluntarily appeared in the court below, without taking the exception, it was an admission of the service, and a waiver of any further inquiry into the matter.

Motion denied.


NotesEdit

This work is in the public domain in the United States because it is a work of the United States federal government (see 17 U.S.C. 105).