Grand River Dam Authority v. Grand-Hydro


Grand River Dam Authority v. Grand-Hydro
by Harold Hitz Burton
Syllabus
903875Grand River Dam Authority v. Grand-Hydro — SyllabusHarold Hitz Burton
Court Documents
Dissenting Opinion
Douglas

United States Supreme Court

335 U.S. 359

Grand River Dam Authority  v.  Grand-Hydro

 Argued: Oct. 12, 13, 1948. --- Decided: Nov 22, 1948

See 335 U.S. 900, 69 S.Ct. 298.

Mr. Howard E. Wahrenbrock, of Washington, D.C., for The United States as amicus curiae.

Mr. Robert L. Davidson, of Tulsa, Okl., for petitioner.

[Argument of Counsel from page 360 intentionally omitted]

Messrs. Robert Dade Hudson, of Tulsa, Okl., and S. Frank Fowler, of Knoxville, Tenn., for respondent.

Mr. Justice BURTON delivered the opinion of the Court.

Notes

edit

This work is in the public domain in the United States because it is a work of the United States federal government (see 17 U.S.C. 105).

Public domainPublic domainfalsefalse