Harris v. State

Supreme Court of Arkansas

318 Ark. 599

Harvey Harris  v.  State of Arkansas

Pro Se Motion for Appointment of Counsel

No. CR-634. --- Delivered: Nov. 7, 1994. 

Court Documents
Per Curiam Decision
  1. CRIMINAL PROCEDURE—POST-CONVICTION RELIEF—CRIMINAL PROCEDURE RULE 37 GOVERNS OVER STATUTES.—Criminal Procedure Rule 37.2(b) provides in pertinent part that all grounds for post-conviction relief, including claims that a sentence is illegal or illegally imposed, must be raised in a petition under Rule 37; statutes are given deference only to the extent that they are compatible with the rules, and conflicts which compromise these rules are resolved with the rules remaining supreme.
  2. CRIMINAL PROCEDURE—TIME LIMITS IMPOSED IN RULE 37 JURISDICTIONAL—RELIEF MAY NOT BE GRANTED ON AN UNTIMELY PETITION.—The time limitations imposed in Rule 37 are jurisdictional in nature, and the circuit court may not grant relief on an untimely petition.
  3. CRIMINAL PROCEDURE—TIME LIMITATION FOR A PETITION UNDER THE RULE EXCEEDED—MOTION DENIED.—Criminal Procedure Rule 37.2(c) provides that a petition under the rule is untimely if not filed within sixty days of issuance of the appellate court's mandate affirming the judgment of conviction; where the mandate was issued on January 7, 1994, but the petition to correct the sentences imposed was not filed until more than sixty days from the date of the mandate, the appellant did not file his petition to correct the sentences imposed on him within the time limit set by Rule 37; Rule 37 was controlling over Ark. Code Ann. § 16-90-111 (Supp. 1991), the petition was untimely, and the appellant was not entitled to relief in circuit court; the appellant's motion for appointment of counsel was denied.

Pro Se Motion for Appointment of Counsel; motion denied and appeal dismissed.

Pro se.

No response.

[PER CURIAM decision of the court.]


This work is in the public domain in the U.S. because it is an edict of a government, local or foreign. See § 313.6(C)(2) of the Compendium II: Copyright Office Practices. Such documents include "legislative enactments, judicial decisions, administrative rulings, public ordinances, or similar types of official legal materials" as well as "any translation prepared by a government employee acting within the course of his or her official duties."

These do not include works of the Organization of American States, United Nations, or any of the UN specialized agencies. See Compendium III § 313.6(C)(2) and 17 U.S.C. 104(b)(5).

Nuvola apps important.svg
A non-American governmental edict may still be copyrighted outside the U.S. Similar to {{PD-in-USGov}}, the above U.S. Copyright Office Practice does not prevent U.S. states or localities from holding copyright abroad, depending on foreign copyright laws and regulations.