Open main menu

Holt v. Alleghany Corporation/Opinion of the Court

United States Supreme Court

384 U.S. 28

Holt  v.  Alleghany Corporation

 Argued: March 21, 1966. ---


The writs of certiorari are dismissed as improvidently granted.

Mr. Justice BLACK dissents from dismissal of the writs and would reverse the judgments of the Court of Appeals and district courts substantially for the reasons stated in Judge Friendly's dissent in the Court of Appeals, 333 F.2d 327, 338.

Mr. Justice HARLAN and Mr. Justice WHITE dissent from the dismissal of the writs, believing that these cases having been taken for review should be adjudicated on the merits.

Mr. Justice DOUGLAS and Mr. Justice FORTAS took no part in the consideration or decision of these cases.

NotesEdit

This work is in the public domain in the United States because it is a work of the United States federal government (see 17 U.S.C. 105).