The pleadings in this case are the same as in Lantry v. Wallace, just decided, 181 U.S. --, ante, 878, 21 Sup. Ct. Rep. 878. The demurrer to the answer and cross petition of Hood was sustained in an elaborate opinion by Judge Philips, holding the circuit court. 89 Fed. 11. The judgment in that court was affirmed in the circuit court of appeals. Lantry v. Wallace, 38 C. C. A. 510, 97 Fed. 865.
For the reasons stated in the opinion just rendered in Lantry's Case, the judgment in this case is affirmed.
Notes edit
This work is in the public domain in the United States because it is a work of the United States federal government (see 17 U.S.C. 105).
Public domainPublic domainfalsefalse