In re Stolar/Concurrence Stewart

942093In re Stolar — ConcurrencePotter Stewart
Court Documents
Case Syllabus
Opinion of the Court
Concurring Opinion
Stewart
Concurrence/Dissent
Harlan
Dissenting Opinion
Blackmun
 Wikipedia article

Mr. Justice STEWART, concurring in the judgment.

Ohio's Questions 7 and 13 are plainly unconstitutional under Shelton v. Tucker, 364 U.S. 479, 81 S.Ct. 247, 5 L.Ed.2d 231. In addition, Question 12(g) suffers from the same constitutional deficiency as does Arizona's Question 27 in Baird v. State Bar of Arizona, 401 U.S. 1, 91 S.Ct. 702, 27 L.Ed. 639. For these reasons I agree that the judgment before us must be reversed.

This work is in the public domain in the United States because it is a work of the United States federal government (see 17 U.S.C. 105).

Public domainPublic domainfalsefalse