Liberato v. Royer
United States Supreme Court
Liberato v. Royer
Argued: March 15, 1926. --- Decided: April 12, 1926
Messrs. Wm. Hamlin Neely, Paul A. Kunkel, and George Ross Hull, all of Harrisburg, Pa., for plaintiffs in error.
[Argument of Counsel from pages 535-537 intentionally omitted]
Mr. Arthur H. Hull, of Harrisburg, Pa., for defendants in error.
Mr. Justice HOLMES delivered the opinion of the Court.
Notes
edit
This work is in the public domain in the United States because it is a work of the United States federal government (see 17 U.S.C. 105).
Public domainPublic domainfalsefalse