Mason v. Rollins/Opinion of the Court

Mason v. Rollins
Opinion of the Court by Salmon P. Chase
723113Mason v. Rollins — Opinion of the CourtSalmon P. Chase

United States Supreme Court

80 U.S. 602

Mason  v.  Rollins


It is manifest that the averments of citizenship in neither of the bills are sufficient to give the Circuit Court jurisdiction under the Judiciary Act of 1789; and all were filed subsequent to the 13th of July, 1866.

When these suits were brought, therefore, there was no act in force giving jurisdiction in cases such as those made by the records, to the courts of the United States. The Circuit Court was obliged, therefore, to dismiss the bill in each case for want of jurisdiction, and the judgment of that court in the several cases must be

AFFIRMED.

Notes edit

This work is in the public domain in the United States because it is a work of the United States federal government (see 17 U.S.C. 105).

Public domainPublic domainfalsefalse