Pacific Exp. Company v. Malin (131 U.S. 394)/Opinion of the Court
This case is dismissed for want of jurisdiction.
Mr. Phillips, for defendant in error, afterwards moved for the issuance of a mandate, and stating that no notice of the motion for the mandate had been served on the opposite party, but that no opposition had been made to the dismissal of the case.
PER CURIAM.
Sufficient cause has been shown, and the mandate may issue at once. Mandate issued.
Notes
edit
This work is in the public domain in the United States because it is a work of the United States federal government (see 17 U.S.C. 105).
Public domainPublic domainfalsefalse