Page:1887 Compiled Laws of Dakota Territory.pdf/1205

This page has been proofread, but needs to be validated.
Challenging the Jury.
CRIMINAL PROCEDURE.
§§ 7358-7362

3. Unsoundness of mind, or such defect in the faculties of the mind or organs or the body as renders him incapable of performing the duties of a juror.

Particular cause.
s. 331, Crim. Pr.

§ 7358. Particular causes of challenge are of two kinds:

1. For such a bias as when the existence of the facts is ascertained, in judgment of law disqualifies the juror, and which is known in this code as implied bias.

2. For the existence of a state of mind on the part of the juror, in reference to the case, or to either party, which satisfies the court, in the exercise of a sound discretion, that he cannot try the issue impartially, without prejudice to the substantial rights of the party challenging, and which is known in this code as actual bias.

Challenge for implied bias.
s. 332, Crim. Pr.

§ 7359. A challenge for implied bias may be taken for all or any of the following causes, and for no other:

1. Consanguinity or affinity within the sixth degree, inclusive, to the person alleged to be injured by the offense charged, or on whose complaint the prosecution was instituted, or to the defendant.

2. Standing in the relation of guardian and ward, attorney and client, master and servant, or landlord and tenant, or being a member of the family of the defendant, or of the person alleged to be injured by the offense charged, or on whose com- plaint the prosecution was instituted, or in his employment on wages.

3. Being a party adverse to the defendant in a civil action, or having complained against, or been accused by him in a criminal prosecution.

4. Having served on the grand jury which found the indictment, or on a coroner's jury which inquired into the death of a person whose death is the subject of the indictment.

5. Having served on a trial jury which has tried another person for the offense charged in the indictment.

6. Having been one of a jury formerly sworn to try the indictment, and whose verdict was set aside, or which was discharged without a verdict, after the cause was submitted to it.

7. Having served as a juror in a civil action brought against the defendant for the act charged as an offense.

8. If the offense charged be punishable with death, the entertaining of such conscientious opinions as would preclude his finding the defendant guilty, in which case he shall neither be permitted nor compelled to serve as a juror.

Exception from jury service not cause of challenge.
s. 333, Crim. Pr.

§ 7360. An exemption from service on a jury is not a cause of challenge, but the privilege of the person exempted.

Cause stated on challenge-Exception.
s. 334, Crim. Pr.

§ 7361. In a challenge for implied bias, one or more of the causes stated in section 7359 must be alleged. In a challenge for actual bias, the cause stated in the second subdivision of section 7358 must be alleged; but no person shall be disqualified as a juror by reason of having formed or expressed an opinion upon the matter or cause to be submitted to such jury, founded upon rumor, statements in public journals, or common notoriety, provided it appears to the court, upon his declaration, under oath or otherwise, that he can and will, notwithstanding such an opinion, act impartially and fairly upon the matters to be submitted to him. The challenge may be oral, but must be entered upon the minutes of the court.

Exception to the challenge.
s. 335, Crim. Pr.
§ 7362. The adverse party may except to the challenge in Exception to the the same manner as to a challenge to the panel, and the same

1181