particular defendant there is not sufficient evidence to put him on his defense, it must, before the evidence is closed, in order that he may be a witness for his codefendant, submit its said opinion to the jury, who, if they so find, may acquit the particular defendant for the purpose aforesaid.
Defendant may be competent witness.s. 1, c. 16, 1879.
§ 7381. In the trial of all indictments, information, complaints, and other proceedings against persons charged with the commission of any crime, offenses, and misdemeanors before any court or committing magistrate in this territory, the person charged shall, at his own request, but not otherwise, be a competent witness, and his failure to make such request shall not create any presumption against him.
Rules of evidence.s. 354, Crim. Pr.
§ 7382. The rules of evidence in civil cases are applicable also to criminal cases, except as otherwise provided in this code.
Overt act for conviction conspiracy.s. 355, Crim. Pr.
§ 7383. Upon a trial for conspiracy, in a case where an overt act is necessary to constitute the offense, the defendant cannot be convicted unless one or more overt acts be expressly alleged in the indictment, nor unless one or more of the acts alleged be proved; but any other overt act, not alleged in the indictment may be given in evidence.
Exceptions.s. 356, Crim. Pr.
§ 7384. A conviction cannot be had upon the testimony of an accomplice unless he be corroborated by such other evidence as tends to connect the defendant with the commission of the offense, and the corroboration is not sufficient if it merely show the commission of the offense, or the circumstances thereof.
Same-Accomplice.s. 357, Crim. Pr.
§ 7385. Upon a trial for having, with an intent to cheat or defraud another designedly, by any false pretense, obtained the signature of any person to a written instrument, or having obtained from any person any money, personal property or valuable thing, the defendant cannot be convicted if the false pretense was expressed in language unaccompanied by a false token or writing, unless the pretense, or some note or memorandum thereof, be in writing, either subscribed by, or in the handwriting of the defendant, or unless the pretense be proven by the testimony of two witnesses, or that of one witness and corroborating circumstances. But this section does not apply to prosecution for falsely representing or personating another, and in such assumed character, marrying or receiving money or property.
Evidence of false pretenses.s. 358, Crim. Pr.
§ 7386. Upon a trial for inveigling, enticing or taking away an unmarried female of previous chaste character, under the age of twenty-five years, for the purpose of prostitution, or aiding or assisting therein, or for having, under promise of marriage, seduced and had illicit connection with an unmarried female of previous chaste character, the defendant cannot be convicted upon testimony of the person injured unless she is corroborated by other evidence tending to connect the defendant with the commission of the offense.
Evidence of seduction.s. 359, Crim. Pr.
§ 7387. If it appear by the testimony that the facts proved constitute an offense of a higher nature than that charged in the indictment, the court may direct the jury to be discharged, and all proceedings on the indictment to be suspended, and may order the defendant to be committed or continued on, or admitted to bail, to answer any new indictment which may be found against him for the higher offense.
Same-Not a former acquittal.s. 360, Crim. Pr.
§ 7388. If an indictment for the higher offense is found by a grand jury impaneled within a year next thereafter, he must
be tried thereon, and a plea of former acquittal to such last1184
