This page has been proofread, but needs to be validated.

Case 1:13-cv-01215-TSC Document 239-1 Filed 03/31/22 Page 114 of 187

  1. ASTM F1014 (1992):
    • The parties identify 46 C.F.R. § 199.05 (2014) as the incorporating by reference regulation, see Becker Decl. ¶ 57, Ex. 90; Wise Decl., Ex. 176, which incorporates the standard for §§ 199.175 and 195.35-5. Section 199.175 requires flashlights on survival craft and rescue boat equipment “must be a type I or type III that is constructed and marked in accordance with the American Society of Testing and Materials (ASTM) F 1014.” 46 C.F.R. § 199.175(a)(12). Section 195.35-5 requires that fireman flashlights “shall be Type II or Type III, constructed and marked in accordance with ASTM F 1014.” Id. § 195.35-5(c). These regulations do not specify that only certain provisions of ASTM F1014 (1992) are incorporated by reference into law, nor does it indicate which specific provisions of ASTM F1014 (1992) are relevant for compliance with the regulation.
    • First Factor: There is no indication that Defendant stands to profit from republishing this standard; Defendant’s apparent purpose is to inform the public about the law and facilitate public debate. See ASTM, 896 F.3d at 449; Def’s 2d Mot. at 16. Defendant’s “attempt to freely distribute standards incorporated by reference into law qualifie[s] as a use that further[s] the purposes of the fair use defense.” ASTM, 896 F.3d at 449. Further, the incorporated standard provides information essential for a private entity to comprehend its legal duties, which weighs heavily in favor of permitting Defendant’s reproduction. See ASTM, 896 F.3d at 450.
    • Second Factor: The “express text of the law falls plainly outside the realm of copyright protection.” ASTM, 896 F.3d at 451. Here, the standard is incorporated into law without limitation such that “the consequence of the incorporation by reference is virtually indistinguishable from a situation in which the standard had been expressly copied into law.” Id. at 452. Accordingly, “this factor weighs heavily in favor of fair use.” Id.
    • Third Factor: The incorporating regulation does not specify that only certain provisions of this standard are incorporated by reference into law, nor does it indicate which specific provisions of the standard are relevant for regulatory compliance, suggesting that “a greater amount of the standard’s text might be fairly reproduced.” Id.
    • Fourth Factor: Defendant’s reproductions have not had a “substantially adverse impact on the potential market for the originals,” nor have Plaintiffs shown by a preponderance of the evidence that there is a meaningful likelihood of future harm.” Memo Op. at 30–36 (internal quotation and citation marks omitted).
    • Conclusion: Defendant may fairly reproduce this incorporated standard in its entirety.
  2. ASTM F1120 1987 (1998):
    • The parties identify 46 C.F.R. § 56.01-2 (2004) as the incorporating by reference regulation, see Becker Decl. ¶ 57, Ex. 90; Wise Decl., Ex. 176, which incorporates the standard for 46 C.F.R. § 56.60-1. Section 56.60-1 provides that “[c]omponents made in accordance with,” ASTM F1120, “and made of materials complying with paragraph (a) this section may be used in piping systems within the limitations of the standards and within any further limitations specified in this subchapter.” 46 C.F.R. § 56.60-1(b), Table 56.60-1(B). The regulation does not specify that only certain

Page 114 of 187