Case 1:13-cv-01215-TSC Document 239 Filed 03/31/22 Page 47 of 47
that [] effort” that went into posting the standards online. Id. Without evidence of any additional harms, this factor weighs strongly in favor of an injunction.
Moreover, the public interest is served by the policy interests that underlie the Copyright Act itself, namely the protection of financial incentives for the continued creation of valuable works, and the continued value in maintaining the U.S. public-private system in place to ensure continued development of technical standards. At the same time, the public would be greatly disserved by an injunction barring distribution of any of the 32 standards which may later be incorporated by reference into law.
Considering all the injunction factors, the court finds that while Plaintiffs are entitled to summary judgment on their copyright claim as to the 32 unincorporated standards, the record does not support a permanent bar on Defendant’s use of those standards, in light of the meager evidence of irreparable harm and the possibility that these standards will be incorporated into law at a later date. Injunctive relief is, however, appropriate as to Plaintiffs’ trademarked logos, and Defendant will be permanently barred from any use of Plaintiffs’ trademarked logos in connection with the posting of these standards online or elsewhere.
IV. CONCLUSION
For the reasons set forth above, Plaintiffs’ Motion will be granted in part and denied in part, and Defendant’s Cross-Motion will be granted in part and denied in part.
Date: March 31, 2022
Tanya S. Chutkan
TANYA S. CHUTKAN
United States District Judge
Page 47 of 47
