"through their own private judgment, willingly and purposely, do openly break" such traditions?
That they "ought to be rebuked openly."
On what grounds?
Because they offend " against the common order of the Church, and hurt the authority of the Magistrate, and wound the consciences of weaker brethren."
Do all these reasons apply in all Churches?
No: the second does not apply in countries where the civil rulers do not uphold the laws of the Church.
How are the consciences of weaker brethren wounded by such conduct?
They learn to break the laws of the Church, by seeing others do it.
If individuals may not break the traditions of the Church, who may change them?
"Every particular or national Church hath authority to ordain, change, and abolish, Ceremonies and Rites of the Church."
May such Churches abolish any ceremonies they think proper?
The Article merely asserts that they may change or abolish such as are "ordained only by man's authority."
In so doing what caution must be observed?
"That all things be done to edifying."
Who is to be judge of this?
Those who are in authority in the Church.
