less whilst the angle it enclosed was increased. But now, as then, it is perfectly at the pleasure of the artist to design his chevron at the height and angle which will best allow the proper representation of the charges which accompany it.
 Fig. 132.—Chevron indented. |
 Fig. 133.—Chevron wavy. |
 Fig. 134.—Chevron nebuly. |
 Fig. 135.—Chevron raguly. |
 Fig. 136.—Chevron dovetailed. |
 Fig. 137.—Chevron doubly cottised. |
The chevron, of course, is subject to the usual lines of partition (Figs. 128-136), and can be cottised and doubly cottised (Fig. 137).
It is usually found between three charges, but the necessity of modern differentiation has recently introduced the disposition of four charges, three in chief and one in base, which is by no means a happy invention. An even worse disposition occurs in the arms of a certain family of Mitchell, where the four escallops which are the principal charges are arranged two in chief and two in base.
Fig. 138.—Chevron quarterly.
Ermine spots upon a chevron do not follow the direction of it, but in the cases of chevrons vair, and chevrons chequy, authoritative examples can be found in which the chequers and rows of vair both do, and do not, conform to the direction of the chevron. My own preference is to make the rows horizontal.
A chevron quarterly is divided by a line chevronwise, apparently
