A HISTORY OF MATHEMATICAL NOTATIONS
the oldest Egyptian writing; the demotic appeared later. The Coptic writing is derived from the Greek and deinotic writing, and was used by Christians in Egypt after the third century. The Coptic numeral symbols were adopted by the Mohammedans in Egypt after their conquest of that country.
26. At the present time two examples of the old Egyptian solution of problems involving what we now term “quadratic equations” are known. For square root the symbol 𓊋 has been used in the modern hieroglyphic transcription, as the interpretation of writing in the two papyri; for quotient was used the symbol (symbol characters).
PHOENICIANS AND SYRIANS
27. The Phoenicians represented the numbers 1–9 by the respective number of vertical strokes. Ten was usually designated by a horizontal bar. The numbers 11–19 were expressed by the juxtaposition of a horizontal stroke and the required number of vertical ones.
|A table should appear at this position in the text.|
See Help:Table for formatting instructions.
Fig. 9.—Palmyra (Syria) numerals. (From M. Cantor, Kulturleben, etc., Fig. 48)
As Phoenician writing proceeded from right to left, the horizontal stroke signifying 10 was placed farthest to the right. Twenty was represented by two parallel strokes, either horizontal or inclined and sometimes connected by a cross-line as in (symbol characters), or sometimes by two strokes, thus (symbol characters). One hundred was written thus (symbol characters) or thus (symbol characters). Phoenician inscriptions from which these symbols are taken reach back several centuries before Christ. Symbols found in Palmyra (modern Tadmor in Syria) in the first 250 years of our era resemble somewhat the numerals below 100 just described. New in the Palmyra numer-
- See H. Schack-Schackenburg, “Der Berliner Papyrus 6619.” Zeitschrift für ägyptische Sprache und Altertumskunde, Vol. XXXVIII (1900), p. 136, 138, and Vol. XL (1902), p. 65–66.
- Our account is taken from Moritz Cantor, Vorlesungen über Geschichte der Mathematik, Vol. I (3d ed.; Leipzig, 1907), p. 123, 124; Mathematische Beiträge zum Kulturleben der Völker (Halle, 1863), p. 255, 256, and Figs. 48 and 49.