Page:A Study of the Manuscript Troano.djvu/225

This page has been proofread, but needs to be validated.
thomas]
INTERPRETATION OF CHARACTERS.
159

that the relative position of the two is exactly the reverse on one plate from what it is on the other.

As the burdens of two of these females evidently consist of their household gods, it is possible that those of the two just alluded to may consist of the bones of their dead. If so, Fig. 94 may represent the skull and the Cimi symbol the other bones. In the inscription above the head of the left-hand female, lower division Plate XX*, we find this character (Fig. 95), which, according to the explanation of the parts so far as given, Fig. 95. should probably be interpreted (reading from right to left) cimen-ich, "the dead children." In this interpretation the right-hand character is given its usual signification; the reticulated portion, ch; and the two lines running upward from this, i. Still it is possible that this explanation is very wide of the mark, as these characters may represent certain fruits or other articles of food, perhaps different kinds of calabashes.

The character represented in Fig. 96 is very closely related to, if not a variant of, the Cimi symbol. Fig. 96. It is found very frequently throughout the Manuscript in the spaces containing the figures or pictorial representations. As in a large proportion of these cases the figures have some reference to death, the gods of death, or of the lower regions, and as the character appears to be a variant of Cimi, I have designated it the "death symbol."

It is found in connection with the supposed god of death in the following places: Lower division of XXXV (when joined with XXXIV); lower division of II*; upper division of VIII*; second and lower divisions of XI*; second division of XXII*; middle division of XXIX*, of XXX*, XXXI*, and XXXIV*. It is also found equally often with the god and goddess with this eye: . It is also found with the god that has the dark stripe across the face, as in the lower division of Plate III. Hence I am inclined to believe that this and the other two are to be classed with the deities of the underworld. We also find this character in several places where the idea of death or destruction is evidently intended to be conveyed. For example, in the upper division of Plates VII and XXV; second and third