Page:A White Paper on Controlled Digital Lending of Library Books.pdf/4

This page has been proofread, but needs to be validated.

of promoting the Progress of Science and useful Arts would be better served by allowing the use than by preventing it.”[1] In this case we believe it would be. Controlled digital lending as we conceive it is premised on the idea that libraries can embrace their traditional lending role to the digital environment. The system we propose maintains the market balance long-recognized by the courts and Congress as between rightsholders and libraries,[2] and makes it possible for libraries to fulfill their “vital function in society”[3] by enabling the lending of books to benefit the general learning, research, and intellectual enrichment of readers by allowing them limited and controlled digital access to materials online.

I.The 20th Century Book Problem

For decades, libraries and cultural institutions have sought to provide greater access to their collections with the hope of reaching a broader and more diverse set of readers.[4] A confluence of technological advances and expanding copyright protection have driven the problem.

Copyright terms are now extremely long (95 years or more for many published works), “formalities” that once required rightsholders to take action to obtain and retain rights have been eliminated, rights are infinitely divisible among private parties causing uncertainty about ownership, and the quantity of copyright-eligible works has exploded with the technological ability to easily and quickly create and publish new works.[5] Librarians now puzzle over questions such as whether a work is actually still protected by copyright (did the rightsholder comply with applicable U.S. copyright formalities?), who owns


  1. Bill Graham Archives v. Dorling Kindersley Ltd., 448 F.3d 605, 608 (2d Cir. 2006).
  2. For users generally, the House Judiciary Committee Report on the 1976 Copyright Act explains that under section 109(a), “[a] library that has acquired ownership of a copy is entitled to lend it under any conditions it chooses to impose.” H.R. Rep. No. 94-1476, § 109, at 79 (1976). The Copyright Act in several other places identifies special considerations with respect to libraries. See 17 U.S.C. § 108 (specific exceptions to reproduce and distribute for libraries and archives); 17 U.S.C. § 504(c)(2) (special damage exceptions for libraries and archives).
  3. U.S. Copyright Office, DMCA Section 104 Report 105 (2001), https://perma.cc/59TU-2NKJ [hereinafter, DMCA Section 104 Report].
  4. For example, Project Gutenberg is a volunteer effort to digitize and archive cultural works, to "encourage the creation and distribution of books.” It was founded in 1971 by Michael S. Hart and is the oldest digital library. See http://www.gutenberg.org/. Others efforts include the HathiTrust digital library, https://www.hathitrust.org/, OpenLibrary, http://openlibrary.org/, and—with a corporate partner—Google Books, https://books.google.com/.
  5. In the context of the “orphan works” problem, these and related causes are explained in more detail in David R. Hansen, Orphan Works: Causes of the Problem (Berkeley Digital Library Copyright Project White Paper No. 3, 2012), https://ssrn.com/abstract=2038068.
Page 4